Before the 3 was a property of Childress, it was a Jr. Johnson property. So, it already had legend power behind it before Dale Sr. took it to new heights.
It is difficult to build a case for retiring a number in NASCAR. I think its great that 61 is retired, considering it is the only one NASCAR ever has retired. But if the 3 was to be retired, then certainly the 43 should be retired as well. Petty and Earnhart each had seven championships, but remember, Earnhardt's first came in the number 2 car. So, Petty's number is a no brainer. And it won't be long before the 48 has six championships which could easily be followed by the seventh (I think 10 is not out of reach for that team). So then, of necessity, 48 would have to be retired as well. So, based on stats, there are four numbers to retire right away. If we decide to retire numbers based on popular drivers who died, then the number of retired numbers would be even higher. And since NASCAR only allows numbers between 0 and 99, given time there could be too many numbers retired to assign to a full field.
I think I have have to agree with our Moderator on this issue; we do need to "get over it".
If we want to consider that the Dillon kids aren't worthy of wearing the number 3, well, that's a different discussion. Is Almirola worthy of the 43? Is Hornish (current driver) or Lagano (next year) worthy of the 22? Is anybody worthy of the 21 (my personal all time favorite was Pearson)?
Difficult discussion...