Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gregsy32

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
Racing Discussion / Re: If I owned a race track !
« on: December 24, 2012, 10:02:22 AM »
I was looking for this thread last week and couldn't find it!

I'd buy a piece of property that previously had a dirt track.  Probably either Twin Valley, Bath, or South Seneca.  I'd keep the original configuration and have some Alabama red clay trucked up here.  We'd open the surface up each week and get water down in it so the track would be tacky and fast.  The track would operate as a club with each member paying dues and having some ownership in the track.  It wouldn't be run as a business.  The goal would be to have fun and keep racing a hobby.  There would be just two classes.  A purestock class that was open to any rear wheel drive production car.  100% stock.  Street legal tires.  The other class would be a class that would allow any combination of OEM parts.  Any tire.  This would allow creativity and should produce some fast cars. By limiting it to stock parts it should keep the overall cost down so that anyone can afford to race. 

17
Racing Discussion / Re: Here's one for the WTF department.
« on: December 22, 2012, 12:07:30 AM »
LaFrance does a lot of cool stuff even with his "conventional" cars.  The sport needs more guys like him.

http://www.dougsdirtdiary.com/gallery/photos/medium/00038155/z6.jpg

18
Racing Discussion / Re: Here's one for the WTF department.
« on: December 21, 2012, 02:48:56 PM »
I cut a body off a 68 mustang this fall.  The car was free and I drove 30 miles round trip to get it.  After i sold some parts and scraped the rest i actually made a few bucks. I guess it all comes down to how you want to approach it.  I realize I'm a minority in the age of clicking a mouse button and having parts show up on your door step.  But it's still possible to do it the old fashioned way and keep a budget in mind.  As was mentioned previously to each his own.

19
Racing Discussion / Re: Here's one for the WTF department.
« on: December 21, 2012, 12:07:39 PM »
paying too much for parts you have to order out of a catalog because you can't find them in a junk yard anymore is what sucks.  I spent a saturday morning in a junk yard a couple weeks ago pulling a 9" rear out of an LTD for my street stock.  It wasn't bad.  I may have actually enjoyed it a little.  Saved myself about $500 when it's all said an done too. 

20
Racing Discussion / Re: Possible new dirt track
« on: December 21, 2012, 12:05:20 PM »
3/8 with only 3 weekly classes.. A beginers class, an intermedite class & a expert class..And at least one of them should be open wheel..Shorter tracks are more fun..

THIS! 

Another track is fine, but it needs to offer something that sets it apart from the others. 

I recently heard a rumor of a new track in WNY myself.  Also heard that it would be running a modern pure stock class that will allow cars with some more modern technology to compete.  ie - rear wheel drive, fuel injected, unibody cars.

21
Racing Discussion / Re: Here's one for the WTF department.
« on: December 20, 2012, 10:48:52 PM »
i like this thread.  I've been preaching stock sheet metal since 1990.   :)  AND IT IS NOT EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN A STOCK BODY.  $300 for a junk car -  $200 Scrap value = $100 for a hood, trunk, roof, 2 doors, 2 quarters, and 2 fenders.  And if you're really old school, yeah you also get bumper covers.  You can't even buy a "spruce up special" from Performance Bodies for your "IMCA Mod" for $100.

when I win the lotto - here's what I'll do. 

Buy a piece of property that has a closed down race track on it.  resurface the orginal layout and breathe some life into a piece of history.  This surface will be opened up weekly and water will be put down and the track will be resealed and worked in.  The surface will be so tacky that it will still suck the shoes off your feet at the end of the night of racing. 

We'll run two classes. 

A street STOCK class that is open to any rear wheel drive car.  Any year, any manufacturer, any engine, any fuel delivery system.  All parts must be stock and in stock location including the body.  You weld in a roll cage, add a fuel cell, and you race. Tires must be DOT legal.  No BS if it's not stock, it's not legal. 

The other class will be a Modified class.  These rules will be simple.  Any OEM part is allowed.  Any combination of any OEM parts is allowed.  May mix and match manufactuers.  All parts must have OEM part number and can be ordered over the counter from a dealership.  No aftermarket parts and no racing parts. Any Tire.  Any stock 2 wheel drive frame or unibody.   Bodies must be stock roof and quarter panels. 

22
Racing Discussion / Re: Just in time for Christmas - the coolest DVD ever.
« on: December 14, 2012, 11:05:25 PM »
60 some years is a looong time.   8)  But the fascinating thing is that it appears the original layout is still highly visable.  I'll tell you that if I owned the land we'd lay some fresh clay down and have some fun. 

23
Racing Discussion / Re: Just in time for Christmas - the coolest DVD ever.
« on: December 14, 2012, 10:09:34 AM »
Hey Bob Johnson....I know you've been on the property and talked to the land owner where the South Seneca speedway is located.  Based on the satellite images it appears that the track is still in form.  What's keeping a lap from being turned there?  Even if it were just a couple select guys running some hot laps.  I wonder the same thing about the track in Whitesville.  Is it just crazy enough to be a possibility???

24
Racing Discussion / Re: Woodhull Crate Rules
« on: November 21, 2012, 04:01:53 PM »
Not to continue to hi-jack the thread, but the point I was making wasn't that if you have an illegal engine that you're automatically going to be the track champion.  My point was there are illegal engines out there and they're not being caught.  There are two cars that I know of first hand that had illegal parts and never cracked the top five.  There is 1 more that I know of that is illegal and wins A LOT.  I don't care what their race results are.  The point is that the crate class isn't any different than any other class out there.  Tech needs to be done no matter what rules are written down.   It almost seems like some people are afraid of good tech.

Sorry Bill.  You can have your thread back now.

25
I've posted here before about using S-10, dakota, and ranger frames.  I think its a great idea and it would allow for more variety in the class.  Ive been kicking around the idea of building a car using a late 90's crown vic frame since they have a parallel 4 link rear and watts link set up.  I think those frames are good candidates also.

I agree with using stock bodies too.  I saw some pictures of a metric chassis with a late 90's 2 door Grand prix stock body on it.  It looked awesome.

26
Racing Discussion / Re: Woodhull Crate Rules
« on: November 16, 2012, 08:03:05 PM »
It is pretty funny though when you're told by a crew member of one of the top teams that - "oh yeah our motor has the seals on it, but it's the most illegal engine out there.  That thing has been all the way apart.  Crank was lightened, heads were worked and Cam was reground". 

27
Racing Discussion / Re: Woodhull Crate Rules
« on: November 14, 2012, 03:46:56 PM »
I've yet to get a good answer back from anyone why you couldn't just take an average of the torque and HP of 3 pulls on the dyno to tech the engines.  If it's above a set number, it's illegal.  That should work whether there are seals on the engine or not.  My fear is that the seals get used as a crutch, meaning - If you look and the seals are on the motor then it must be legal no further inspection required.  Thats the same kind of logic as I read it on the internet so it must be true.

28
The Tech Barn / Re: 2013 southern tier street stocks
« on: November 13, 2012, 10:22:32 AM »
i don't know.  this is why i race go karts now.   ;D ;D ;D

29
The Tech Barn / Re: 2013 southern tier street stocks
« on: November 13, 2012, 09:58:26 AM »
Clint and Todd are right.  No one ever seems to learn from past experience.  They killed off the old superstock class and went to the 360 LM rules, which cost twice as much to get on the track. Now the street stock class is pretty damn close to what the old superstock class was.  Why didn't we just save everyone the time, effort, and money and keep the rules the same 8 years ago?  We don't even have a street car class anymore, unless you want to consider the FWD class.  I still believe that the biggest problem with the street stock class is that the metric chassis is a freaking dinosaur.  You pretty much are forced to buy purpose built racing parts to fit those chassis because you can't pull a 1983 Monte Carlo out of a hedgerow for parts anymore.  And when is the last time you saw an old Malibu?  I've said it before and I guess I'll say it again - there needs to be a set of rules that will allow you to take a rear wheel drive street car (for example a 1996 camaro), knock the glass out of it, weld in a cage, and go race.

30
The Tech Barn / Re: 2013 southern tier street stocks
« on: November 12, 2012, 12:20:30 PM »
The super late models have always amazed me by how few drivers wear gloves.  No window nets in a LM either.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8