The size of the track is just an excuse here. Places like Lebanon Valley, Rolling Wheels, Cayuga International, Indianapolis Raceway Park, Berlin Speedway in Marne, Michigan Autodrome Drummond in Quebec are relatively the same size as Shangri-La II give or take) and most of them are or have been successful as a weekly or special events track. Everybody wants to play the blame game here. The track seems to have no identity. They have the prime night of racing for the week and for the most part run when there is no competition from local activities such as high school sports and the like. Their sister track down the road a few miles runs almost the same program and from what I've seen and heard "head and shoulders" have their collective act together. Where do all the Friday night cars go on Saturday. In this day and age of one-night-a-week racers, it would seem that one track has hit a home run and the other a foul ball. The one collective comment I keep hearing and I think I've said myself a couple of times "this has track has so much potential". The same was once said about Rolling Wheels back in the day. That facility has had so many stops and starts in it's forty-six year history (yes forty-six years, August 10, 1969) and I really don't it has reached it's full growth potential yet. I've seen the last three ROC shows at Shangri-La II and all three had two things in common. First off great weather and second and most noticeably the serious lack of fannies in the seats. Why was that. Was that Andy's fault? Was it George's fault? Was it the economy? Take your pick. I don't have the answers, I just have the comments. Until someone (don't care who) takes the bull by the horns, Shangri-La II will continue to have double digit fields of cars and maybe triple digit fan counts and that my dear folks is a pathetic shame!